Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
loader
Home
X
User account menu
  • Log in

User login

CAPTCHA
16 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
  • Reset your password
Main navigation
  • About ECG
  • Documents
  • Communities of Practice
  • Calendar of Events
  • External Resources
Download
Print
Member's Documents
December 2016

IFAD's Decentralization Experience Corporate-level Evaluation

Published by: Independent Office of Evaluation, International Fund for Agricultural Development
SDGs: SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals

The evaluation found that the objectives of the decentralization process were broadly relevant to improve the development effectiveness of IFAD-funded operations. In particular, by bringing IFAD closer to its operation and to the country development context and actors, country presence was expected to improve project and strategy design and implementation support, enhance engagement in non-lending activities, improve alignment with country systems and donor coordination, and contribute towards system-wide coherence of the United Nations. 
 
However, IFAD could have learned more from the experience of other organizations and could have been more realistic in its expectations. In particular, the range of activities that country offices were to perform was very broad compared to the resource envelope allocated to them.  Moreover, for many years IFAD concentrated on expanding its country presence but paid little attention to re-organizing headquarters.

The report also highlighted that by opening country offices, IFAD was in a better position to provide implementation support to its operations. It is through this support that country offices contributed to better project performance and results, especially in terms of impact and gender equality. But the contribution to non-lending activities (e.g. knowledge management, partnership-building and policy dialogue) was mixed. This was partly due to the limited human and financial resource available at the country-office level for non-lending activities. Moreover, engagement in policy dialogue largely depended on relevant interests and experience of individual staff members.

Back to Documents

Related

Independent Office of Evaluation, International Fund for Agricultural Development
Footer Menu
  • Home
  • About ECG
  • ECG Member Institutions

Copyright © 2023 ECG. All Rights Reserved.